Tiny House
More About The National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation • Join Now!
Community News

Community Indicator

Community indicators are statistical measures of a community's quality of life, through which a community can track things getting better or worse. Often they are created through extensive conversations in the community.

Communities around the world have developed local statistics to measure their collective well-being. Starting in the 1970's, more and more communities realized that so-called economic indicators – like Gross Domestic Product, employment statistics, average family income, etc. – could be high or rising, while the quality of life experienced by people could be quite low. Even seemingly affluent communities realized they were haunted by drug abuse, environmental decay, a frantic pace of life, alienation, mounting health problems, and so on. So they decided to create statistics of their own, ones which would more accurately reflect the felt sense of their community's health and well-being. As alternatives to Quality of Life, many communities choose indicators related to Sustainability or Healthy Communities.

All statistics provide informational feedback for reflection by the organization, community or society gathering the statistics, and therefore are an important resource for Collective Intelligence. The more these statistics reflect the true needs and aspirations of the community and the harmonious relationships between the community and the world around it, the more co-intelligent those statistics can be considered.

See

  • Redefining Progress' Community Indicators Project http://www.rprogress.org/projects/indicators/
  • Susan Strong, The GDP Myth: How It Harms Our Quality of Life and What Communities are Doing About It, $11.50 + state tax if applicable, from the Center for Economic Conversion, 222 View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 -Phone: (650) 968-8798 Fax: (650) 968-1126 – E-mail: cec@igc.org

Community Indicator Projects are those where communities have a vision for a sustainable future and have established ways of tracking their progress through the use of indicators.The list of indicators varies and is generally developed by the community itself. The technique has been used mostly in North America and Europe. The most successful projects have three characteristics in common:

  • First, the community created a vision of its future that balanced economic, environmental, and social needs. This future is long term; not in the order of years, but . . . decades or generations.
  • Second, the vision incorporated the views of a wide cross-section of the community.
  • Third, the community decided how to keep track of its progress in reaching that vision.
    (Source: http://www.johnsonfdn.org/library/journal/v19n2/indicators.html)

Objectives:

  • Community indicators measure progress toward community sustainability action plan goals.

Outcomes:

  • Community indicators provide a set of indicators that allows a community to keep track of its progress in reaching an agreed vision.

Uses/strengths:

  • Can be used to educate other residents and to mobilize additional community members to join in community efforts.
  • Can either precede efforts to build a community-wide initiative or be developed through a community-wide process. Both approaches are valid and serve distinctly different yet complementary purposes.
  • Can still be used to inform and engage a wider cross section of the community when the set of indicators are developed by a small, non-inclusive group of concerned residents first
  • Can help generate community-wide interest reporting of change through measurement and indicators.
  • May reveal data previously unknown by residents and decision-makers.
  • Helps build citizens' capacity for community involvement and participation.
  • Benefits from the community members' combined experience and their firsthand knowledge about their community
  • Allows monitoring of change over time.
  • When it's difficult to know which are most urgent issues or will be most effective actions, a community indicator project can measure and guide the community.

Special considerations/weaknesses:

  • The steps that have been chosen as indications of progress toward a goal, should be relevant to the entire community.
  • The Indicator Project will need ongoing management.
  • Indicators can be incorporated into wider statutory/legislative frameworks and this may be beyond the scope of the project and the experience of the project leaders.
  • There may be difficulties in identifying and agreeing on accepted stakeholders'

Resources required:

  • Publicity
  • Venue rental
  • Catering
  • Staffing
  • Engagement of moderator/facilitator.

Suitable for use by:

  • Government
  • Community

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Discover community issues
  • Develop community capacity
  • Develop action plan

Number of people required to help organise:

  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)

Audience size:

  • Large (> 30)

Time required:

  • Long (> 6 months)
  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)

Skill level/support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)
  • Medium (Computer & other expertise)

Cost:

  • Medium (AUD$1,000-AUD$10,000)
  • Low (< AUD$1,000)

Participation level:

  • High (Stakeholders participate in decision)

Innovation level:

  • High (Innovative)

Method:

  1. Select a representative sample of the community
  2. Organise the appropriate method to gather people together. This may be in the form of a meeting or it may be done via phone or email.
  3. Establish a vision for the future and the steps that are needed to get there(Strive to balance environmental, social and economic issues in all decision-making activities).
  4. Develop a set of indicators that will indicate that progress is being made – significant milestones that have made concrete and measurable progress towards the future vision.
  5. Can also be developed by a small group prior to community-wide visioning and planning processes for educational purposes, and then be developed through community-wide involvement.
  6. Monitor progress against indicators
  7. Publish and circulate regular progress reports through media and newsletters.

References:

  • International Association for Public Participation (2000) IAP2 Public Participation Toolbox http://www.iap2.org/practitionertools/index.html [accessed 17/12/02].
  • Izaak Walton League of America (1998) Monitoring Community Sustainability http://www.iwla.org/sep/pubs/monitor.html US$2.50 Available to order online [accessed 20 Dec 2002].
  • Hart, Maureen. (1997) Evaluating Indicators: A Checklist for Communities. Wingspread 19(2). Available online at http://www.johnsonfdn.org/info/publications/journal/v19n2/indicators.html [accessed 20 Dec 2002).

Many of the resources in the “Participatory Practices” category originated in Coastal CRC's Citizen Science Toolbox (www.coastal.crc.org/au/toolbox/). With permission, NCDD included the resource on our wiki so practitioners could expand upon the listing.

  More Resources  

Add a Comment

-